Shannon, over at SavingAdvice, disagrees with the popular notion that you should hire others to do your work for less:
I am not against the idea of hiring someone to do work for me. In fact, I gladly pay people to cook for me the six or seven times a month I go out to eat and would do it much more often if I had a limitless income. I just don’t believe that my salary is the best criterion to use when deciding whether or not to do something myself.
I couldn’t agree more. I love going out to restaurants, and if I had limitless income and limitless health, I would be doing it thrice a day every day. But, alas, I don’t, so lets move on.
Shannon goes on to say:
Taking the argument of “hire someone to work for less than you do” to its logical extreme, if you make $40 an hour and you hire someone to cook for $20 per hour, someone to clean for $10 per hour, and someone to do your shopping for $20 per hour, each person makes less than your hourly rate, but you are already spending more than you earn.
Precisely. There’s nothing wrong with hiring somebody out to do your work for you even if you make only $10 a hour and the other person costs $10 a hour, if you can afford to hire them. On the other hand, just because you’re making $100 a hour doesn’t mean that you can afford to hire somebody at $10/hour. It depends on what the rest of your expenses look like.
You’ll never hear any financial advisor telling you to outsource work for less if you are making $10,000 a month but spending $12,000. But if you’re making $1000 a month and spend only $250 (if you are, contact me, I want to know how), then you can hire somebody who charges $50 a hour. If you want.
Which brings me to…
Do you like it or hate it?
Just because somebody can do it for less doesn’t automatically mean that you should outsource it. What if you don’t hate it? What if — gasp — you actually like it? Could that $25/hour x 10 times a month = $250/month be utilized for something better? No? Maybe you can invest it? $250 a month invested at 10% for 30 years will give you $542,830.27. Even you save only $25 a month, you will get $54,283.03 in 30 years.
Now tell me if you hate something enough to let go of that kind of money. It’s not a trick question. I hate cleaning the bathroom. If somebody asked me whether I would rather spend $250 a month to clean my house even if it will cost me $542,830.27 over the next 30 years, I’ll pick hiring the cleaning lady 10 out of 10 times. I hate cleaning and the joy I get every month that I don’t have to do any cleaning is far more important to me than the cost of losing half a million dollars. On the other hand, if somebody were to ask me to outsource cooking to someone for $250 a hour, I would not do it. It’s not even that I like cooking: I just don’t hate it enough to lose that kind of money.